Connect with us

Buy Black All Year Long

An Election Conspiracy Theorist Responsible for Circulating Batshit Coup PowerPoint Spoke Several Times with Meadows and the Trump White House: Report – Mother Jones


Politics

An Election Conspiracy Theorist Responsible for Circulating Batshit Coup PowerPoint Spoke Several Times with Meadows and the Trump White House: Report – Mother Jones


Mark MeadowsTom Williams/Getty

Fight disinformation. Get a daily recap of the facts that matter. Sign up for the free Mother Jones newsletter.

Perhaps it should surprise no one that former President Donald Trump’s scrambling henchmen reviewed a literal, honest-to-god PowerPoint presentation with plans for a coup attempt in early January, as the president’s efforts to retain power despite his electoral loss were reaching a fever pitch. Then-Chief of Staff Mark Meadows got the document sent to him just a day before the Capitol riot; he recently turned over the presentation, titled “Election Fraud, Foreign Interference & Options for 6 JAN” to the congressional committee investigating January 6, according to a letter released by the committee this week. The PowerPoint’s recommendations are staggeringly batshit: Trump, the document said, should declare a national security emergency, proclaim all electronic voting invalid, and ask Congress to decide on a path forward. Vice President Mike Pence, it added, should abuse his ceremonial power to certify the election results to reject electors from “states where fraud occurred” or replace them with Republicans. 

A new Washington Post story on Saturday concedes it’s still unclear how widely the PowerPoint was shared, and how seriously it was taken, (Meadows’ lawyer says there is no sign his client “did anything with the document after receiving it by email”) but its reporting still sheds a bit more light on its influence: A person responsible for circulating the presentation, cybersecurity consultant Phil Waldron, spoke with Meadows “maybe eight to 10 times” and was part of a team that briefed several members of Congress on a version of the PowerPoint the night before the January 6 insurrection. Waldron told the Post that his presentation argued there was “significant foreign interference in the election” and recommended “constitutional, legal, feasible, acceptable and suitable courses of action.” (In fact, scholars say there was no legal basis for Pence to intervene in the electoral vote-counting process, as…



Source link

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Bitcoin Video Course
360 Virtual Video Tour
Rich Dad Summit
Regal Assets Banner

Facebook BlackEconomic

Moocow Moolah

Popular Posts

To Top