Connect with us

Buy Black All Year Long

Remy Ma and Fat Joe Dodge Lawsuit Claiming They Stiffed Co-Producer Out of Money and Ownership Rights to 2016 Hit


News

Remy Ma and Fat Joe Dodge Lawsuit Claiming They Stiffed Co-Producer Out of Money and Ownership Rights to 2016 Hit


Remy Ma and Fat Joe’s pockets are staying all the way up after their recent court victory.

For the past two years, the New York rappers have been caught up in a lawsuit claiming they stiffed Eric A. Elliot, the co-producer of their 2016 hit “All The Way Up,” out of proper compensation and ownership rights. But, just days into the new year, a federal judge sided with the rappers citing that not only was compensation paid, but that any ownership rights were forfeited at the time of payment. 

Remy Ma and Fat Joe Photo: @fatjoe/Instagram

“Elliott’s retrospective frustration at the amount of money notwithstanding, there is no dispute that Elliott signed the contract, assigning his rights to the song, while simultaneously receiving the $5,000 check from Fat Joe in exchange,” ruled U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on Jan. 8.

Elliot, rap alias Fly Havana, claims he and rapper Infrared put the record together in 2015. Though still unfinished, Elliot alleges he gave the record to Infrared, who then introduced him to Fat Joe. To Elliot’s knowledge the record had not made it any further, at least not until the following year when he heard it blasted on every radio station as the street anthem throughout the spring and summer months. 

In an attempt to receive compensation and credit for his contributions to the record, Elliot claimed he contacted the Terror Squad leader, who agreed to meet at a Miami IHOP. He alleges it was there that Fat Joe had him sign a document before writing a check for $5,000 with the guarantee of more money to follow as the record continued to grow bigger — but more money never came. 

Despite Elliot’s disapproval of the $5,000 he received two years ago, Judge Buchwald made it clear in no way would he be entitled to future funds. “Try as he might, Elliott cannot avoid the clear and plain language of the contract that no additional compensation will be due to Elliott,” the judge wrote. “Any alleged statements regarding future or additional compensation are explicitly contradictory to these specific and unambiguous provisions of the…



Source link

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Bitcoin Video Course
360 Virtual Video Tour
Rich Dad Summit
Regal Assets Banner

Facebook BlackEconomic

Moocow Moolah

Popular Posts

To Top